The phrase 'broader external validity' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase when discussing the effects of a study on a broader group or population. For example, "We conducted a small study, but we believe that its results can be applied to a larger population due to its broader external validity."
First, unlike other pediatric CGM trials [ 2, 4, 5, 7, 8], the CGM TIME Trial did not use a run-in period to pre-select or screen subjects likely to adhere to CGM, and thus offers broader external validity and generalizability to the real-life application of CGM in the pediatric population.
However, our inclusive approach to case study selection did lend a broad external validity to our findings.
Also, the network includes all patients in participating practices who have been diagnosed as having a primary cardiovascular event and prescribed low dose aspirin to prevent a secondary event in primary care, supporting the broad external validity of these findings.
Furthermore, a broad participation increases external validity and enhances future dissemination and implementation into rheumatological practice worldwide.
Furthermore, the broad participation increases external validity and enhances future dissemination and implementation into rheumatological practice worldwide.
When used in the assessment of vaccination programmes therefore they have high external validity and broad generalisability.
By 'pragmatic' and 'simple' we are referring to studies that are designed to test effectiveness, have few endpoints and broad eligibility criteria, thereby increasing external validity.
Moreover, the small sample size and the exclusion of LTOT patients may limit the external validity and broad applicability of these findings.
We demonstrate that, because of the data sufficiency requirements for sampling, the cohorts being identified for research may not be representative of the broader patient population, thus compromising the external validity of research conducted using EHR data.
Further research involving the SPICE instrument is warranted to (1) assess its external validity in a broad population of medical and pharmacy students, (2) evaluate test-retest reliability and criterion validity, and (3) expand this instrument for use in other health professions.
This broad range of diagnoses will also improve external validity, which is often not optimal in randomised trials which have too narrow inclusion criteria [ 24].
