broad enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "broad enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it any time you want to talk about something that is wide in scope, or not restrictive enough. For example, "This essay question is broad enough that it encourages creative thinking."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

More important, they are not broad enough.

The New York Times

The law is certainly broad enough.

The New York Times

Does dance attract a broad enough audience?

The Guardian

But are his shoulders broad enough?

The New York Times - Sports

This language is broad enough to encompass appellee's cross-appeal.

Cornell University

Utah has a statute broad enough to authorize such recoveries.

Cornell University

The language is broad enough to cover all.

Cornell University

Like him, but perhaps not broad enough in his appeal.

The New York Times

The MDGs were broad enough to allow local variation.

The Economist

The wine list is broad enough and reasonably priced.

The Guardian - Travel

This trio's shoulders are broad enough to bear it.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When evaluating if something is "broad enough", clearly define the criteria for breadth or scope to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "the definition is broad enough", specify "the definition is "broad enough" to include all relevant cases".

Common error

Avoid assuming that because something is "broad enough", it is necessarily comprehensive or effective. "Broad enough" simply indicates that the scope is wide; it doesn't guarantee quality or completeness. For example, don't assume that simply because a law is "broad enough" to cover many scenarios that it is, therefore, fair or just.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "broad enough" typically functions as an adjective complement, modifying a noun by describing its extent or scope. Ludwig shows many instances where it clarifies whether something encompasses a required range or variety.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "broad enough" is a versatile phrase used to express whether something is sufficiently inclusive or extensive for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness and usability. The phrase sees frequent usage in news, academic, and scientific contexts, indicating its wide applicability. Remember to use "broad enough" precisely by defining the criteria for breadth. Be careful with assuming that because something is "broad enough" that it is therefore comprehensive. Consider using alternatives like "sufficiently wide" or "adequately inclusive" for nuanced expressions. Overall, "broad enough" is a valuable addition to your vocabulary for describing scope and inclusivity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently wide

Emphasizes the extent of width or coverage.

adequately inclusive

Focuses on the degree to which something includes diverse elements.

sufficiently comprehensive

Highlights the completeness and thoroughness of something.

sufficiently extensive

Stresses the reach and range of something.

sufficiently encompassing

Focuses on the ability to surround or include a wide range of items.

sufficiently ample

Indicates a generous or plentiful amount.

adequately general

Focuses on generality and lack of specificity.

sufficiently overarching

Highlights the ability to cover a wide area or scope.

sufficiently generalized

Emphasizes the level to which something is made applicable to a wider context.

adequately expansive

Highlights the capacity to expand or grow.

FAQs

How can I use "broad enough" in a sentence?

You can use "broad enough" to describe something that is wide in scope or not restrictive. For example, "The curriculum is "broad enough" to cover all the necessary topics".

What are some alternatives to using "broad enough"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "sufficiently wide", "adequately inclusive", or "sufficiently comprehensive".

Is it better to be "broad enough" or specific?

Whether being "broad enough" is better than being specific depends on the context. In some situations, a broad approach is necessary to encompass all possibilities, while in others, specificity is crucial for clarity and precision.

Can something be too "broad enough"?

Yes, something can be too broad if it becomes vague or meaningless. If a definition or policy is too "broad enough", it may lack focus and become difficult to implement effectively.