‘Bring litigation’ is correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase is typically used to refer to the process of initiating a legal case through the court system. For example: “The company decided to bring litigation against its competitor for patent infringement.”.
(On second thought, this might bring litigation).
The coalition presidents also hinted that they might bring litigation against their brethren, urged Congress to look at antitrust issues and framed the debate in stark terms.
And where there is a lack of political will, we need to bring litigation of the kind that drove down prison populations in California and New Jersey and organize to make our voices heard.
Mr. Cuomo, following the lead of most other states, intends to establish an independent nonprofit organization that would serve as an outside advocate for those with disabilities and mental illnesses and that could bring litigation against the state.
Although the rule changes, in their final form, may be more modest than some big media companies had sought -- the networks have already threatened to bring litigation even before they are announced -- the deregulatory trend has some critics deeply concerned.
"I have to say that throughout eight years, the city repeatedly required us to bring litigation, whether it was on behalf of New Yorkers with mental health problems or homeless children," said Steven Banks, the director of the Legal Aid Society's homeless rights project.
The organization has brought litigation against the state over care for people with disabilities.
"We brought litigation, civil litigation and civil charges, against CIA officials in Pakistan for their role in drone strikes.
Mr. Icahn made similar charges of empty voting in the proxy battle involving Mylan's acquisition of King Pharmaceuticals and actually brought litigation against the hedge fund Perry Capital.
GSK initially challenged the generic firms, claiming that their products would infringe its patents on Seroxat, which expired in 2003, and brought litigation proceedings against GUK and Alpharma.
He has had a leading role in bringing litigation, mostly successful, that has defined what legal scholars have called "the new federalism".
