Sentence examples for breed frequency from inspiring English sources

The measure of haplotype homozygosity (HAPH) measures selection within breed and is defined as the variance of haplotypes frequencies at a particular position in the genome, i.e. where p i is the (within breed) frequency of the ith haplotype and N is the total number of haplotypes at the position.

For each chromosome segment we calculated a modified version of Depaulis-Veuille's H-test [ 8], referred to as HAPH, where HAPH =, where p i is the (within breed) frequency of the ith haplotype and N is the total number of haplotypes observed for the breed at the position.

A dynamic map with breed frequencies, animal diplotypes, viewable trace files, and references was also produced and is available at: http://cgemm.louisville.edu/USDA/index.html.html

To estimate the degree of association seen for the Bonferroni significant polymorphisms, correlation between disease risk and average breed allele frequency for each SNP was calculated.

In the Brown Swiss (BS) breed the frequency of the K allele is very rare with about 2% in the German BS population [ 48] and fixed for the A allele in the Italian BS population [ 51].

In both breeds the frequency spectrum of ancestral polymorphisms is generally flat.

In the modern Finnish breeds, the frequency of G- oY1 was 77%, 57%, and 60% in Finnsheep, Kainuu Grey, and Åland, respectively [see Additional file 4: Table S3], indicating that SNP G- oY1 is frequent in the modern north-European breeds.

In the contemporary native Finnish breeds, the frequency of SNP G- oY1 ranges from 57 to 77% [see Additional file 4: Table S3] and the frequency of SNP G- oY1 is highest in north European, British Islands and central Russian populations [ 12], [see Figure 2 and Additional file 4: Table S3].

In the second group of breeds average frequencies of I-668 and G-660 alleles were 0.41 and 0.23, respectively.

Therefore, cat microsatellite markers may have more uniform inter-breed allele frequencies than the more genetically isolated, domesticated dog breeds (DeNise et al. 2004).

In these two groups of breeds, opposite frequencies of the two polymorphism most related with gene expression differences (g.667_668insC and g.660G > C) were observed.