Exact(1)
Comparison of the three breed to the all breed correlation for un-windowed FST values showed that changing the breed composition in this experiment resulted in a 40.4% decrease in the amount of the variance in FST explained across the genome.
Similar(59)
The across-breed correlation for pairs of SNPs that were separated by 0 to 10 kb and 10 to 25 kb produced almost identical patterns [See Additional file 2: Figures S5 and S6].
This is done by utilizing information on the new estimates, estimates from the previous run, Interbull's own expectations and for non-Holstein breeds, correlations from Holstein [ 3].
Between-breed correlations are presented in Additional file 1. Correlations based on all 34 genetic lines are below and correlations for the combined L and T lines only are above the diagonal.
Correct rates for purebred animals were identical for the within-breed and combined-breed scenarios for both breeds, but correlation coefficients increased slightly (around 0.01) in the combined-breed scenario.
For the Montbéliarde breed, the correlation was also higher for the "randomly selected" group for milk yield (0.77 instead of 0.74), but for SCC it was lower for the "randomly selected" group than for the elite group (difference of 0.02).
In a large-scale genome-wide survey of SNP variation in cattle breeds, the correlation of r declined as the divergence between breeds increased [ 42].
When the between-breed genetic correlation differed from 1, i.e. allele substitution effects differed across breeds, empirical and deterministic accuracies decreased in proportion to the genetic correlation.
Between breed genetic correlations between behavioural traits and feather score, skin score and mortality were low and those between sociality and skin lesions and culling were labile.
Among the three breeds no correlation was found with linear measurements.
The across-breed predicted correlation from the simulation [ 47] varied from a high of 0.4 for 50 QTL down to 0.2-0.3 0.2-0.3 QTL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com