Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Fibroblasts from normal breast were compared with fibroblasts from carcinomas in order to determine whether they had differing effects on stimulating tumor cell invasion.
The outcome and prognostic factors of 217 women with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and those of 1121 women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast were compared.
The greatest lesion diameters (mm) obtained by gray-scale breast ultrasound and CEUS of the breast were compared with the greatest lesion diameter (mm) on pathology.
NE 1, NE 2, NE 4 8, NE 10 12, NE 14, NE 18, NE 20, NE 25, NE 27, NE 29 30 in the Additional file 1) from the liver, pancreas and breast were compared with the above described second control set of 2 normal tissues and 2 non-neuroendocrine tumor samples.
In a hospital-based case-control study of female breast cancer conducted in Athens (1989-91), 820 patients with confirmed cancer of the breast were compared with 795 orthopaedic patient controls and 753 hospital visitor controls, matched to the cases by age and interviewer.
A total of 116 breast cancers and 37 biopsies taken from non-malignant breast were compared for FGF-1 mRNA expression using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and significantly lower levels were found in the cancer tissues (P < 0.001).
Similar(54)
Radiation dose to the breast was compared with the pad and without.
In all these methods, cosmetic outcome of the treated breast was compared with the untreated breast and scored using the 4-point Likert scale, which classifies outcomes as excellent, good, fair, or poor.
The dose distributions for PGTV and PTV OARs (lungs, left ventricle, heart, thyroid gland, and breasts) were compared.
A recent study found more consistent image quality with better contrast, fewer artefacts, fewer technically inadequate films and slightly better lesion characterisation when conventional and digital mammograms of the same breasts were compared [ 5] (Fig. 1).
The water and fat content of both breasts was compared using magnetic resonance (MR).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com