Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
A UK government review says the national breast screening programme is damaging more women's lives than it saves and should be scrapped.
Conclusion The NHS breast screening programme is only moderately likely to be cost effective at a standard threshold.
The primary aim of the NHS breast screening programme is to reduce deaths from breast cancer by early detection.
The Dutch breast screening programme is characterized by low referral rates and relatively high-interval cancer rates.
The balanced presentation afforded by convening a Citizens Juryy when considering a major question such as the introduction of a breast screening programme is advocated.
The probability that the breast screening programme is cost effective compared with no screening was 45% (2260 scenarios) at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY.
Similar(47)
Women have been routinely encouraged to have screenings since the breast screening programme was introduced in the UK in 1988, and its success has been measured in part by how many women took part.
In 1988, the breast screening programme was introduced.
The national NHS breast screening programme was introduced in 1988 and women aged 50 to 70 are invited for screening every three years.
The population eligible for screening by the Trent Breast Screening Programme was 441 000.
It should be noted that screening units in Northern Ireland used two-view mammography at both prevalent and incident screens when the breast screening programme was introduced in 1989.
More suggestions(11)
breast screening case is
breast screening programme means
breast screening programme continues
breast screening programme has
breast cancer programme is
breast screening programme saves
breast screening mammography is
breast screening uptake is
breast screening attendance is
breast screening programme serves
maternal screening programme is
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com