Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Use of these oral breakpoints in the current study suggests that penicillin resistance is high globally (PISP, 23.4%; PRSP, 14.8%), thus oral penicillin treatment of pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae would appear to be ill-advised.
Similar(59)
Where more than one copy of the breakpoint location existed in the current configuration (for example, the region had undergone tandem duplication in a previous rearrangement), which copy of the breakpoint location to use was chosen randomly.
Susceptibility results are difficult to compare between these two earlier reports and the current study as CLSI interpretive breakpoints were used in Rodloff et al. [ 6] and Nørskov-Lauritsen et al. [ 7] while EUCAST breakpoints have been used in the current manuscript.
The limit of stability (breakpoint) of the current in the plasma sheet may be equivalent to that of the strength of the spring attached to the tippy bucket (Fig. 4).
Sequence analysis found that the duplication is similar in both Broiler and White Leghorn lines, and all 12 LF animals showed the 78 bp breakpoint junction fragment (marker STS_break in the current study) indicating that the duplication is similar in all animals.
As discussed above, in the current study, oral breakpoints (susceptible ≤0.06 mg/L, resistant ≥2 mg/L) have been used for penicillin against S. pneumoniae and not the parenteral breakpoints (meningitis: susceptible ≤0.06 mg/L, resistant ≥0.12 mg/L; non-meningitis: susceptible ≤2 mg/L, resistant ≥8 mg/L).
The MIC breakpoints suggested by the current CLSI 2009 document were used for all antimicrobials tested.
In the current study we selected 21 GCRs for which the GCR breakpoints were previously analyzed [28] for further analysis including 2 predicted monocentric GCRs (M1-M2), 16 predicted dicentric GCRs (D1-D16) and 3 GCRs for which the breakpoint sequences could not be amplified (U1-U3).
Not in the current schedule.
& 6% in the current year.
In the current Mutual Shares.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com