Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Also the fraction of probes below and above the break criterion for classifying the probe sets into present and absent ones remains essentially constant.
The break criterion provides a total absent rate of 47% which well agrees with the percentage of probe sets for S. pombe printed on the chip (~47%).
The selective masking in these both examples shows that the simple break criterion gives rise to false present calls (of potentially absent probes) of less than 57% 7% even if one neglects cross hybridization.
Comparison of the Σ-values with the break criterion however clearly indicates that the GADPH-signals of sample A are dominated by non-specific hybridization which was shown to level-out 3'/5'-expression differences (see also the open circles in the middle panel of Figure 10 which indicate the position of the 3'- and 5'-probe sets of GADPH along the hook curve).
Similar(56)
The Breaking Celerity Index (BCI) is proposed as a new wave breaking criterion for Boussinesq-type equations wave propagation models (BTE).
The following wave-breaking criterion shows the wave breaking is only determined by the slope of ρ but not the slope of u.
Comparing with the modified two-component Camasssa-Holm equation [23], we investigate the local well-posedness, global existence, and a wave-breaking criterion in the Sobolev space.
The new bond breaking criterion that we employ replaces the ad-hoc approach inherent in bond-stretch-based or bond-energy-based conditions.
A wave-breaking criterion for strong solutions is determined in the lowest Sobolev space Hs, s>32 by using the localization analysis in the transport equation theory.
In Section 4, we employ the transport equation theory to prove a wave-breaking criterion in the low Sobolev space H s ( S ) × H s − 1 ( S ) with s > 3 2.
We use the technique of [7], [27] to derive a wave-breaking criterion for strong solutions of the system (1) in the low Sobolev spaces H s ( S ) × H s − 1 ( S ) with s > 3 2.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com