Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
When the above two factors are combined with a grain matrix interaction scheme that approaches a Sachs-type model, the evolution of the Goss and Brass orientations on the α-fibre is well captured and for the first time, the F orientation along the γ-fibre is successfully predicted.
Similar(59)
The brass orientation {1 1 0}〈1 1 2〉 is dominant at every strain level.
In the softer brass orientation and in the absence of Taylor factor hardening, more diffuse MSB formation occurred.
The "near-Cube" orientations tend to be stabilized by slip on 110 planes while the "brass" orientation undergoes a substantially reduced ε12 (in-plane) shear.
During plane-strain compression these "Brass" oriented crystals remain stable in terms of the final, average, orientation, with a small orientation spread.
The evolution of microstructure and local crystallography has been examined in pure Al single crystals of {110}〈112〉 orientation (brass or B-orientation) deformed by channel die compression at room temperature to logarithmic strains of ϵ=0.5 and ϵ=1.5.
On the other side, the stress along rolling direction caused some unstable orientation grains to rotate towards the Brass and S orientations during the age-forming process.
The microstructures in grains near the brass and S orientations correspond to the Type AI microstructure.
From these data, the Brass and Copper orientation components that are typical in retained austenite such as in TRIP steels were found to have low transformation potential values.
We present crystal plasticity finite element simulations of plane strain compression of α-Brass single crystals with different initial orientations.
In terms of the overall orientation density all predictions (using different neighborhood configurations) remain within a narrow tube with an orientation scatter of 10% (β-fiber) to 20% (Brass component, α-fiber)) when the neighborhood changes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com