Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
CORRECTION: In most phylogenies that are seen in textbooks and the popular press, branch length does not indicate anything about the amount of evolutionary change that has occurred along that branch.
Specifically, in the case of H. tarapotensis, internode and branch length does not seem to explain its unsupported affinities and none of the plastid and nuclear data recovered strongly supported relationships for this species.
Similar(58)
Axillary branch length did not differ significantly from Col values (Fig. 5F).
We note that the approach we have implemented here, using a rate multiplier and a single set of molecular branch lengths, does not allow for heterotachy (variation in the pattern of rates among sites over time), although this is known to be an important source of variation in patterns of substitution [ 1, 11].
Assuming an exponential Bayesian prior on branch lengths did not improve, and under certain extreme conditions significantly diminished, performance.
Length does not, of course, determine quality.
Length does not matter.
Sleeve length does not matter.
Single branches whose length did not exceed the threshold were eliminated; multiple branches with comparable lengths that were shorter than the threshold were combined from their common root by averaging their terminal locations.
The exact length doesn't matter.
At this point, length doesn't matter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com