Sentence examples for branch categories from inspiring English sources

Branch analyses were performed with four branch categories: Orycteropus, Choloepus, Dasypus, and all other branches.

In this model there are two branch categories, and thus two independent estimates of ω: category 0, for the background branches, i.e. all lineages in the phylogeny excluding the Eutherian lineage; and category 1 for the foreground branch, i.e. the Eutherian lineage.

The "Araucaria mirabilis" trees had 3 branching categories, corresponding to the typical pattern in extant Araucariaceae, although 4 branching categories cannot be completely discarded.

The proportions of dead and decayed knots found in stem timber associated with specific branching categories were: live branches 28%; small dead branches 40%; large dead branches 25%.

"Other types" includes lines that did not fall into standard branching categories such as branching in 1st and 4th quarter or 2nd and 4th quarter or 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarter or 1st, 2nd and 4th quarter.

Categories not meeting the dental conditions in the '≥10 teeth in each jaw' branch and categories meeting the dental conditions in the '<10 teeth in each jaw' branch were not further dichotomized to the next level.

Put another way, each data partition consistently contributed the same relative proportion of the total number of CI = 1 characters among branch length categories, but the absolute number of these characters differed among partitions.

We pooled data into 4 branch length categories (0 0.0019; 0.0020–0.0049; 0.0050–0.019; 0.0200–0.0500) to increase sample sizes for these tests Additionally, the relative contribution of each partition to a node was examined by calculating the consistency index of unambiguous character changes at first, second, and third codon positions in the simultaneous analysis tree.

The comparison study revealed that most of the original GO annotations (93.5%) were contained in the B2G-FAR repository as exact matches and more specific/general terms and only a small fraction (6.5%) were lost (other GO branch and category annotations) during the annotation process, presumably due to GO version differences or the removal of root category terms in the B2G-FAR repository.

Four key questions form the first level "branches" or categories of the ontology and correspond to the basic, abstract structure of the knowledge domain of vulnerability assessments and, hence, to the entry point of the semantic wiki later on.

In this case, an explanation for the deviations documented in specific GO branches and categories might be found in the different goals driving basic research projects and applied breeding activities in model and crop plants.