The phrase "brain migration" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to neuroscience, psychology, or developmental biology, often referring to the movement of neurons or brain cells during development.
Example: "During embryonic development, brain migration is crucial for the proper formation of neural circuits."
Alternatives: "neural migration" or "cerebral migration."
Therefore, we may conclude by saying that unless the economic and political conditions in Turkey improve, whether in the form of asylum, labour, family or brain migration, Turks will continue to flow to the European countries.
Moreover, it was shown that during neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, meningitis, viral encephalitis, Prion disease, and HIV-1 associated neurocognitive disorders) monocyte brain migration can occur based on the generation of chemotactic gradient facilitated by inflammation [30].
Having shown that the brain-migration association is robust, we then may ask how the association has evolved.
However, the brain-migration association cannot be explained on the basis of any of these factors (Table 1).
Next, we used the MCMC approach [31] to detect the order and direction of evolutionary changes in the brain-migration association (Fig. 3A).
The limited explanatory power of the brain-migration association is not surprising considering the variety of environmental factors that may influence brain size and migratory behavior.
The evolutionary transitions that generated the brain-migration association were evaluated with phylogenetic Markov chain methods, implemented in the DISCRETE option from BAYES-TRAITS [28], [30].
We used such a phylogenetic framework in an attempt to clarify which of the hypothesized evolutionary scenarios is more likely to account for the brain-migration association.
This model suggests that the brain-migration association is in part caused by unanalyzed effects [sensu 36] associated with the correlation between BMR, incubation period and body mass, once latitude is taken into account.
To better grasp the strength of the brain-migration association, we compared brain size of migratory and resident species from the same taxonomic family, assuming that closely-related species are more likely to have been subject to similar selective pressures.
Finally, we further explored the best supported scenarios with path analyses, which allowed us to assess to what extent the brain-migration association was caused by direct effects or by indirect effects associated with environmental, energetic and/or developmental factors.
