bound for size

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bound for size" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a concept related to limitations or constraints regarding size, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The project was bound for size limitations, which affected the design choices we could make."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Finally, for the remaining two gaps, corresponding to breakpoint regions (see below), we estimated an upper bound for size.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

As an application of his theory of lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms, Baker [11] gave an explicit upper bound for the size of integral solutions of hyperelliptic curves.

Advances in Difference Equations

In the present work, we give a general lower bound for the size of such designs.

Discrete Mathematics

A fragment-based approach to synthesis can result in an infinite molecular search space unless an upper bound for molecular size is specified.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Thus, it is essential to estimate a tight upper bound for the size of the unknown vector in order to achieve good performance.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Delsarte and Seidel found that the dimension of a certain linear space can serve as a Fisher type lower bound for the size of a weighted regular t-wise balanced design.

Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A

D is said to be a small k-dominating set if it has at most [n/k+1] nodes, which is the best lower bound for the size of D in general.

Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics

Consequently, the mean convergence of the state estimation error vector for L=2 is obtained by fulfilling the Conditions 1 and 3 reported for L=1 except the bound for step size μ which is given by: 0<mu<frac{2}{lambda_{text{max}} textbf{Z}[k])}, ~~~forall k (31).

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The next lemma [[10], Lemma 12.1] gives a lower bound for the size of rational points, whose images are not in the set W. Lemma 4 Let W be a finite subset of J ( Q ), and let L be a sublattice of Z r.

Advances in Difference Equations

This provides a relative lower bound for the size of the currently sequenced L. monocytogenes pan-genome.

BMC Genomics

A possible improvement could be the introduction of an additional upper bound for the size of the recognized features, thus reducing and possibly underestimating the number of cells since larger aggregates formed of merged cell images will then be excluded.

BMC Ophthalmology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using the unclear phrase "bound for size", opt for more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "limited by size" or "size-constrained" to ensure clarity and avoid misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid using "bound for size" in formal writing. It is often mistaken for phrases indicating destination rather than dimensional constraints. Using precise language ensures your intent is accurately conveyed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bound for size" is intended to function as a descriptive phrase indicating a relationship or restriction related to dimensions; however, its usage is non-standard. Ludwig AI flags the phrase as incorrect, further underscoring its questionable status.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "bound for size" is not a standard or grammatically correct English expression. Ludwig AI identifies it as incorrect and suggests clearer alternatives such as "limited by size" or "size-constrained". While the intended meaning might be to indicate a constraint related to dimensions, it's advisable to avoid this phrase in formal writing. Use the alternatives for better clarity and to ensure accurate communication. The term sees rare usage across a limited range of contexts, including science and news.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited by size

This alternative directly states a limitation imposed by size, offering a clearer and more conventional expression.

restricted in size

Similar to "limited by size", it uses "restricted" to convey a constraint on the dimensions.

size-constrained

This is a concise, adjective-based alternative indicating that size is a defining constraint.

dimensionally bound

This more technical phrase implies restrictions on dimensions, suitable for contexts where precision is necessary.

with size limitations

It clearly indicates that there are limitations associated with size, offering a more explicit explanation.

subject to size restrictions

This alternative uses "subject to" to emphasize that size limitations are externally imposed or mandatory.

having a size constraint

Similar to "with size limitations", this option offers a more descriptive and explanatory tone.

designed for specific dimensions

This phrase shifts the focus to design considerations based on particular size requirements.

cut to size

This alternative describes the action of cutting something to a specific size.

headed towards a certain size

This option indicates an object is moving or growing towards a particular dimension.

FAQs

What does "bound for size" mean?

The phrase "bound for size" is not a standard English expression and its meaning can be unclear. It might suggest a limitation or constraint related to size, but it's better to use clearer alternatives such as "limited by size" or "size-constrained".

How can I use "limited by size" in a sentence?

You can use "limited by size" in sentences like: "The design options were limited by size due to space constraints" or "The project's scope was limited by size to fit within the budget."

What's a more concise way to say "bound for size"?

A more concise alternative to "bound for size", if you're trying to convey a dimensional restriction, is "size-constrained". For example: "The device is size-constrained to fit in a pocket."

Is "bound for size" grammatically correct?

No, "bound for size" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's recommended to use more precise and commonly accepted phrases such as "limited by size" or "restricted in size".