bound by contributions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bound by contributions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where someone is restricted or obligated due to the contributions they have made or received. Example: "The committee members felt they were bound by contributions to uphold the values of the organization."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Unlike the governors associations, however, the Congressional groups are bound by contribution limits.

The New York Times

The campaign is actively hunting for new wellsprings of cash, while tapped-out donors who want to give more are contemplating financing independent efforts on her behalf that are not bound by contribution limits.

The New York Times

The committee is not bound by contribution limits and can accept money directly from corporate treasuries.

HuffPost

That means it is not bound by federal contribution limits, laws that bar White House officials from soliciting contributions, or the stringent reporting requirements for campaigns.

The New York Times

Unlike a presidential campaign, Organizing for Action has been set up as a tax-exempt "social welfare group". That means it is not bound by federal contribution limits, laws that bar White House officials from soliciting contributions, or the stringent reporting requirements for campaigns.

The New York Times

In the past, independent expenditures needed to collect contributions from a large number of individuals, who were bound by federal contribution limits, in order to be influential.

Huffington Post

Romney and his supporters had raised about the same, but much more of it has come from well-funded super PACs that are not bound by political contribution limits.

The Washington Post

Since taking Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts public, Mr. Trump had been bound by a "contribution agreement" that required him to engage in the gambling businesses only through his own company and banned him from personally owning more than 5percentt of the stock in any other casino company.

The New York Times

The scores were weighted by allele frequency, giving epitopes bound by prevalent MHC molecules a larger contribution to the final epitope score.

FEMS Microbiology Reviews

The e-mail message also noted that previous Microsoft contributions to the group were not bound by the negotiations taking place over the control of intellectual property.

The New York Times

Best of all, even though the current system of independent groups favors Republicans, they are bound by their own rhetoric to support the elimination of campaign contribution limits.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "bound by contributions", ensure the context clearly indicates what type of contributions are being referred to (e.g. financial, collaborative, etc.) for better understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "bound by contributions" without specifying what kind of contributions are being discussed. Be precise to prevent misinterpretation of the obligation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bound by contributions" functions as a descriptor, indicating a state of obligation or constraint arising from the act of contributing something. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its usability in describing situations where restrictions or obligations are linked to contributions.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "bound by contributions" is grammatically correct and usable, describing a state of obligation or restriction resulting from contributions. According to Ludwig AI, while it's a valid phrase, this analysis indicates that it occurs rarely in written English. Its usage spans various contexts, including news, science, and business. When using this phrase, clarity in specifying the contribution type is essential to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases such as "obligated due to donations" and "constrained by financial input" can provide more specific alternatives. Due to the limited presence in the database, more examples would be needed to refine this analysis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obligated due to donations

Focuses on the obligation created by financial contributions.

constrained by financial input

Highlights the restriction caused by monetary contributions.

restricted by monetary assistance

Emphasizes the limiting aspect of financial help.

tied to investments

Implies a connection and obligation stemming from investments made.

beholden due to support

Highlights the sense of being in someone's debt because of their support.

dependent on funding

Shows reliance and therefore obligation due to financial resources.

accountable for endowments

Stresses responsibility derived from received endowments.

answerable because of grants

Highlights the responsibility to justify the use of grants.

obligated through sponsorship

Indicates a duty arising from a sponsorship agreement.

committed due to investments

Emphasizes a dedication stemming from investments made.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "bound by contributions" to sound more formal?

In more formal contexts, consider alternatives such as "obligated due to donations", or "constrained by financial input".

Is "bound by contributions" always related to financial aspects?

While often associated with finances, "bound by contributions" can also refer to obligations arising from collaborative efforts or other non-monetary input. Be sure the context is clear.

What does it mean to be "bound by contributions"?

To be "bound by contributions" means being obligated or restricted due to what one has given or received. It implies a sense of duty or commitment connected to the contributions.

What's the difference between "obligated due to donations" and "bound by contributions"?

"Obligated due to donations" specifically refers to a financial obligation, while "bound by contributions" is a more general term that can encompass various types of input, not just monetary.