Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The PREP, on the other hand, showed 28% α-helix which was even marginally better than untreated ("directly from the bottle") sample.
Similar(59)
Purpose: Visually clear bottle samples are filtered and plated on selective media to assess sterility.
A total of 2096 bottle samples were obtained using a CTD/Rosette sampler during 57 cruises (1995 2014) in the range 116 121.5°E and 22 26.5°N (see Supplementary Fig. S2).
For the conversion of the instruments' outputs to SSC, i.e. calibration, and for validation, gravimetric analysis of bottle samples is recommended as reference.
(Unlike some of the other Bordeaux classifications, whose rankings never change, St. Émilion's version resets every decade. A government commission accepts written applications and bottle samples from vineyards and puts together a new ranking for the next 10 years).
These empirical equations were derived from in situ salinity and temperature and measured chemical concentrations that were collected during 57 cruises (1995 2014) with a total of 2096 bottle samples.
Each Niskin bottle sampled 2 liters of seawater, which was used for the direct counts, culturing, and water chemistry.
Therefore, the sensitivity was sufficient for performance with positive blood culture bottle samples.
Of 200 negative blood culture bottle samples, 21 samples (10.5%), including seven GP- and 14 GN-bacteria, had positive results with the real-time PCR assay (Table 3).
In this study, this technique allowed the simultaneous detection, quantification, and Gram identification of bacterial and fungal organisms directly from blood culture bottle samples.
Currently, novel diagnostic technique such as MALDI-TOF MS was developed and evaluated with positive blood culture bottle samples [ 20, 21].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com