Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Finally they compared today's yields with what their models say yields would have been with today's farming but in the 1980's climate.In this section Hindering harvests Bats building bonds Bite the birds How to build a 1,000mph car ReprintsPopping cornFor both wheat and maize, the results, published this week by Science, were negative.
Voigt et al. [ 46] found that transformation-mediated disruption of FGL1 encoding a secreted Fusarium graminearum lipase led to reduced extracellular lipolytic activity in culture and reduced virulence to both wheat and maize.
Also, although the majority of both wheat and maize seed storage proteins are prolamins, maize does not contain the wheat prolamin variants (gluten proteins) that are needed for bread making.
Both wheat and maize breeders have been interested in finding closely related species with smaller genomes that may act as models for these important crops – maize breeders look to sorghum and the millets, wheat breeders to a small grass, Brachypodium distachyon, whose genome is at present being sequenced (Paterson, 2006).
Similar(56)
This negative gradient in recombination is in stark contrast to wheat and maize, both of which show clear patterns of recombination increasing with relative distance from the centromere (Lukaszewski and Curtis 1993; Akhunov et al. 2003; Gore et al. 2009).
However, it is not surprising that Dreb2 can also be induced by cold/frost as shown by recent studies in wheat and maize since both drought and cold/frost stresses lead to dehydration of cells [ 59, 60].
The staple crops are wheat and maize.
Wheat and maize prices have fallen to eight-month lows.
By the mid-1970s, wheandand maize yields had doubled in places such as India.
Well, she says, her family farm wheat and maize, and are relatively wealthy for this area, so yes.
Staples like wheat and maize have already shown declines in crop yields in recent decades, the report found.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com