Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Cecilia et al. report a sensitivity of 100% for DENV and 95.8% for CHIKV, while the specificity was 100% for both viruses when compared to conventional RT-PCR [ 24].
Similar(59)
Within genotype I, two non-conservative amino acid substitutions P305S (domain III) and N390S (domain III) were identified in the 1997 viruses when compared against the 1987 viruses.
The overall prevalence rate for GIV.2 NoVs (4.8%) was markedly lower than the prevalence rates reported for other NoVs in humans (27, 31, 37 ), correlating with the lower prevalence of GIV viruses when compared with GII and GI viruses.
The GHI spacers known to be found in oral species of Gemella and the VSI spacers found in oral species of Veillonella had many fewer spacers matching oral viruses when compared to streptococcal spacers.
Taken together these results support a model where the IFITM123 protein family and RIG-I all play a crucial role in the tolerance of ducks to highly pathogenic and low pathogenic strains of avian influenza viruses when compared to the chicken.
Taken together these results support a model where the IFITM123 family and RIG-I play a crucial role in the tolerance of ducks to high and low pathogenic strains of avian influenza viruses when compared to the chicken and other Galliformes.
Lungs of Ceacam1−/− mice contained significantly less lytic virus when compared to WT mice (Fig. 1A).
Cox 2 gene was highly induced by the mutant virus when compared with the wild type.
Significantly higher transgene expression was observed 24h after injection CaGl with virus when compared to virus only (Fig. 5e).
Similar analysis showed 17 amino acid substitutions throughout the genome and one deletion in the NA stalk region in the QA23CkA10 virus when compared to the WT702 virus.
Cytokine dysreglation has also been seen in animals (mice, ferrets, macaques) experimentally infected with H5N1 virus when compared with seasonal influenza (H1N1 or H3N2) viruses [10], [11], [12].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com