Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Short, coarse, brittle hairs, called kemp, may be intermingled with both types of fibre.
The results indicated both types of fibre increased pre-cracking strength, but only minibars enhanced the post-cracking behaviour, likely due to protection from the polymer.
The influence of the addition of both types of fibre on energy absorption and tensile strength at high strain-rate was investigated, and the performance of the two types of fibre-reinforced mortar was compared.
Similar(56)
Immediately lateral to the spinal ganglia the two roots unite into a common nerve trunk, which includes both sensory and motor fibres; the branches of this trunk distribute both types of fibres.
Nevertheless, the straightening of the end hook of both types of fibres embedded in matrixes with 0.20 and 0.25 W/B ratios are similar.
On the other hand, the pullout response of both types of fibres exhibit somewhat different slip behaviour before the second drop of the pullout load.
Overall, both types of fibres showed extremely similar pullout behaviour but difference in maximum pullout load and pullout work (Figs. 6, 7).
On the other hand, the improvement in total pullout work due to decrease in W/B ratio is relatively more significant than that in maximum pullout load for both types of fibres with LE (10 mm).
This can be explained by the slightly higher maximum pullout load was observed for both types of fibres in 0.20 W/B ratio series with an embedded length of 10 mm than those of 15 and 30 mm (Table 4).
Note that the embedded length of the 3DH2 fibre (LE = 30 mm) is two times that of the 3DH1 fibre (LE = 15 mm), to allow fair comparison an embedment length of 10 mm for both types of fibres is considered here.
It is noteworthy from Table 4 that for the matrix with 0.20 W/B ratio the increase in embedded length of both types of fibres did not improve fibre stress and the values of the maximum fibre stress is found to be very similar.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com