Sentence examples for both types of children from inspiring English sources

Both types of children were found to enjoy a place with such characteristics.

Because the inflammatory changes represented by children using inhaled CSs and those with respiratory infection are likely to be different, we did not necessarily expect that the pollution effect lag structures would be the same for both types of children.

For both types of storybooks, child attention, child language, and parent engagement were significant predictors of story comprehension.

When teachers received both types of information, children were one and half times more likely to be rated as having positive social adjustment at school entry (OR = 1.51, p > 0.05) compared with other children.

If the criteria were met on both types of items, the child was classified as ADHD-C.

While some of the children received the feedback that they were smart, other children received the feedback "you must have tried really hard!" Both types of feedback praised the children, but the key difference was that one of them emphasized innate or fixed ability (you're so smart!) and the other emphasized the role of the kids' effort (you tried hard!).

Children with teachers who contacted their early education centers and received both types of information (about specific children and curriculum) were one and half times more likely to receive higher ratings of positive social adjustment at school entry (OR = 1.51, p > 0.05).

The results for the structural equation model also showed that the positive benefits for information sharing were for children who received both types of information sharing, and outcomes for children who had only one type of information sharing reported by their teachers were not statistically different than children who had no information sharing.

Given that in all other cases (shape of the feet of the booby and shape of the nutcracker) less than 10% of pre-school children provided both types of explanation, one might question whether these children actually understood the question about usefulness.

But they offered the first nationally representative comparison of children attending both types of schools, and are expected influence public debate.

Both types of impact were accentuated where children were severely affected, including high levels of emotional distress as well economic costs of home care and treatment seeking.