Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(36)
The results obtained suggest that the finite element-based procedure yields the results, which are very similar to their molecular modeling counterparts for small-size nano-valves, for which both types of analyses are feasible.
Comparing these locations in both types of analyses show that for the joint designs consisting of one or several plates, J1, J2s and J2r, the point of first yield (Fig. 7a c respectively) corresponds to the point of first failure (Fig. 10a c respectively), and is located at the corners of the loading edge of the adhesive overlap.
However, the discrepancies displayed on Fig. 11 between the results of both types of analyses suggest that the results from the linear elastic models are not reliable enough, since they cannot approach closely enough the results from the non-linear models.
In both types of analyses, statistically significant functions were determined using the Fisher Exact test.
Only the three SNP triplets that were significant in both types of analyses were verified.
However, since the results were essentially the same from both types of analyses, we reported the results based on the more traditional procedures.
Similar(24)
Both types of morphological analyses were made blinded to genotype.
This finding was observed for both types of conjunction analyses.
For both types of immunophenotypic analyses, we observed a higher frequency of mDCs (approximately 0.4%%) compared to pDCs (approximately 0.2 %) (Suppl. Fig. 1a).
Six agencies address the type of sensitivity analysis but generally consider both types of sensitivity analyses [ 20], depending on the assessed variables [ 19, 23, 25] or on the number of varied parameters [ 7, 30].
We also noted whether any other related IPD meta-analyses or meta-analyses based on aggregate data had been cited, and where both types of meta-analyses were cited we looked for evidence that any distinction had been made between the two.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com