Exact(3)
The results showed that both total and progressive motility, as well as the percentage of normal spermatozoa, were higher for EP sperm than for CT sperm (P < 0.01).
In contrast, in samples with lower motility, there was a significant effect on both total and progressive motility.
Experiments on individual samples then showed a similar profile of results to pooled samples, and, notably showed a significant increase in both total and progressive motility (Fig. 3A and B; Supplementary data, Fig. S1).
Similar(57)
In Experiment 1, total and progressive motilities did not differ among pre-freeze stages of cryopreservation (P > 0.05).
Likewise, the percent change in post-thaw sperm total and progressive motilities, during 3 h incubation at 37 °C, was less (P < 0.05) in bison semen frozen at −40 °C/min.
However, sperm total and progressive motilities declined (P < 0.001) in freeze-thawed semen by 35%and42%2%, respectively, compared to after cooling (pre-freeze) semen.
The percent change in post-thaw sperm total and progressive motilities, VAP, VCL, VSL, IPM-high ΔΨm and IPM-IACR during 3 h incubation at 37 °C, was less (P < 0.05) in TCA than in Triladyl®.
Post-thaw total and progressive motilities of bison sperm were greater in Triladyl® at 0 h whereas sperm survival was greater in TCA extender during 3 h post-thaw incubation.
In experiment 1, the effect of storage of liquid bovine semen in INRA96 diluent (IMV Technologies, L'Aigle, France) at 1 of 5 storage temperatures (5, 15, or 28°C, and fluctuating between 5 and 15°C or 5 and 28°C) on total and progressive motility and kinematic parameters was assessed objectively via computer-assisted sperm analyzer on d 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 after collection.
As expected, the majority of these patients had normal total and progressive motility (27/32 Table IV).
Under capacitating and non-capacitating conditions, these compounds significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased the percentage of total and progressive motility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com