Exact(13)
However, McDowell (1994), Sedivy (1996) and Brewer (1999) endorse both theses while denying that experiences and beliefs are linked in either of these ways.
They defend both theses on the grounds that experiences can provide justification for beliefs only if these theses are true.
There are very good reasons to think both theses are false.
Hume rejects both theses.
Both theses were eventually published.
The sizes obtained from both theses analyses are in close agreement.
Similar(47)
Clearly enough, one who accepts both these theses must conclude that the Separation Thesis is fundamentally flawed.
It follows that, for appearances, both Thesis and Antithesis are false.
Moreover, for each antinomy in the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant derives both thesis and antithesis by deductive argument from alleged a priori premises.
In the first two Critiques, his general approach is to argue, for each antinomy, that both thesis and antithesis presuppose Transcendental Realism, insofar as they make claims about things in themselves; and to adduce Transcendental Idealism as the vantage point from which the initial contradiction is solved.
For example: "Because of its humiliating and demoralizing effect on African American slaves, black face was used less as a comedy routine and more as a way of enforcing racial segregation" and "Science is beginning to seriously question whether a comet, not an asteroid, was responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs" are both thesis statements.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com