Sentence examples for both these interpretations from inspiring English sources

15:24 (Asad) and well do We know [the hearts and deeds of all human beings - both] those who lived before you and those who will come after you; (Or: "those of you who hasten forward [towards Us], and those who lag behind". Both these interpretations are considered equally legitimate by the early commentators).

On both these interpretations, the thesis is dubious.

Both these interpretations can be applied to a recent case: the invalidation of the patents of Myriad Genetics for two genes with mutations that cause cancer (BRCA1 and BRCA2) by the US supreme court.

However, we propose that both these interpretations fail to fully explain this phenomenon, and that, several months after the events took place, some crucial questions still wait for a clear answer (Delamothe, 2011).

Both these interpretations have the same effect for major males: major offspring of females from the high density pre-mating group had longer horns across a wide range of body sizes than major offspring of females from the low density pre-mating group.

Both of these interpretations have been ventured by rival Nabokovians.

However, both of these interpretations are patently incorrect and are couched in misunderstandings and misconceptions (that is, inherently biased conclusions always result from false assumptions and/or incorrect data).

The view of the present author is that both of these interpretations may miss the Neoplatonic context in which Nicholas discusses human knowledge and may underestimate how important philosophical theology is to the Cusan exposition of knowing.

Both of these interpretations have been challenged by some modern scholars, who argue that these traditional depictions of Adams are myths contradicted by the historical record.

I recognize that, in varying degrees, both of these interpretations have their utility; service in particular is a very important part of Hindu culture and plays a necessary role in addressing humanitarian concerns.

However, in my opinion, both of these interpretations remain limited in that they seem to not address the structural causes of social injustices like poverty, hunger, and homelessness, and, therefore, appear on the surface to not provide for systemic social change.