Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed under both the random effect and the fixed effect models.
Similar(59)
sm, mark, clawback and cea have a negative and statistically significant coefficient in both the random effects and fixed effects approach.
The results of the tests for attrition bias using a dummy variable that captures whether the individual is in the sample in the following year as proposed by Verbeek and Nijman (1992), in which the null hypothesis is no bias, are shown in Table 5 for both the random effects specifications and the pooled specifications.
Both the random effects model and GEE methods allow for correlation of outcomes within the same village cluster.
Summary effect sizes and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated using both the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird and the fixed-effect model.
We carried out meta-analyses of these 35 genetic variants under simple genetic models using both the random-effects model and fixed-effects model [ 22, 23].
When each one of the included RCT was compared against the pooled results of the remaining RCTs in each meta-analysis, the SMD showed a significantly greater percentage agreement than the MD in both the random-effects and the fixed-effect models for all degrees of heterogeneity.
Second, both the random effects and the fixed effects models gave these two studies more weight because of their relatively large size.
The coefficients can be obtained both from the fixed and the random effect models; we use the random effect coefficients.
The influence of the random effect in both models was evaluated by comparing the intercept S.D. to the residual S.D., as recommended in [64].
We pooled the study-specific estimates using both the fixed effect model and the random effect model proposed by DerSimonian and Laird; when a significant heterogeneity was found, the random effect model results were presented.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com