Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
A case study of a middle disc of Oldham coupling was done, in which the disc was produced using both the new investment casting and the sand casting and the parts made by both the methods were compared.
Both the methods were scored with equal and high score values against contextualization.
For this comparison, only those hotspot locations commonly identified by both the methods were extracted, and their matching rate was computed with respect to the total area of hotspots.
MO-PET showed the highest intra-class correlation coefficient compared to the reference GTV with 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88 0.96; Table 2), slightly better than the gradient-based method with 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71 0.9; Table 2), although the correlations in both the methods were not statistically significant.
Both the methods were tested with blood plasma obtained from T1DM, type-2 diabetes (T2DM) patients and non-diabetic controls.
Only results from the maximum-likelihood method were presented, as trees drawn from both the methods were similar.
Similar(53)
The theoretical background of both the methods is discussed.
It is found that the results from both the methods are very similar.
The performance of both the methods is judged by finding Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Both the methods are matching with a correlation coefficient of >0.9.
Simulation results demonstrate that both the methods are effective ways to mitigate blind velocities in DDMA MIMO GMTI radar systems.
More suggestions(18)
both the processes were
both the approaches were
both the methods described
both the waveforms were
both the loops were
both the methods showed
both the solutions were
both the spins were
both the samples were
both the bylines were
both the Parkers were
both the sites were
both the instabilities were
both the models were
both the weddings were
both the methods revealed
both the varieties were
both the mothers were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com