Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
It is found that the results from both the methods are very similar.
Both the methods are matching with a correlation coefficient of >0.9.
Experimental results and error performances of both the methods are shown in Fig. 15 and Table 1 respectively.
(The equations for calculating the particle agglomeration number using both the methods are given in Appendix A).
Simulation results demonstrate that both the methods are effective ways to mitigate blind velocities in DDMA MIMO GMTI radar systems.
Comparative results from the analysis of copolymers produced by Ziegler Natta, chromium and metallocene catalysts show that both the methods are useful for characterizing LLDPE resins.
Similar(48)
The theoretical background of both the methods is discussed.
The source code for both the methods is available from the websites of the respective authors.
Both the methods were scored with equal and high score values against contextualization.
The performance of both the methods is judged by finding Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
For the mismatch scenario, the performance of both the methods is comparable as shown in Table 6.
More suggestions(19)
both the devices are
both the modes are
both the mechanisms are
both the procedures are
both the approaches are
both the nanofluids are
both the horses are
both the lidars are
both the diseases are
both the brothers are
both the experiments are
both the species are
both the objects are
both the mycobacteria are
both the methods have
both the consorts are
both the functions are
both the acts are
both the representations are
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com