Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Both tests were evaluated with visual and automated reading (scanner) and the validation was performed on 10 different antibiotics (penicillin-G, cloxacillin, sulfamethazine, sulfadiazine, oxytetracycline, gentamicin, cephalexin, cefquinome, dihydrostreptomycin and trimethoprim).
Both tests were evaluated in terms of changes in subjective symptoms, changes in objective neurological findings, and changes in the spinal level considered to be responsible.
Both tests were evaluated and approved for the purpose of TSE surveillance in small ruminants using obex tissue samples by the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office.
Both tests were evaluated using the unit cost of the Vall d'Hebron hospital (€66.25 for PCR and €46.38 for bacterial culture).
Similar(56)
The proposed screening tests were evaluated and tested using both patients and healthy adults in a comparative study with state-of-the-art Alzheimer's screening tests.
Laboratory tests were evaluated considering laboratory reference results.
0, 2, or 5 No standard tests were evaluated.
All statistical tests were evaluated at the 95%% confidence level using the SPSS software.
Cell viability tests were evaluated by cell counting kit-8 (CCK) and live/dead cell assay.
All statistical tests were evaluated at the p< = 0.05 level of precision.
The tests were evaluated after 48 h under coded conditions (See Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com