Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
For the dorsal slice the differences between both techniques were not statistically different.
Both techniques were not effective in the complete removal of debris from the isthmus regions.
The differences in manipulation time and procedure time between both techniques were not significant.
Similar(57)
However, both techniques are not devoid of inherent disadvantages.
Both techniques are not suited to test the underlying structure of the SDQ.
Bland and Altman analysis also revealed a significant bias (with radial SOS providing a lower estimation) and more importantly large limits of agreement between the Z-scores of measures, indicating that both techniques are not comparable.
Although data to date look very promising, one must realise that both techniques are not yet validated to predict antitumour activity or real patient benefit in the clinical situation.
The dead zone breakthrough curves for both tracer addition techniques were not consistent, neither were aggregate RTDs observed in each dead zone.
Both qualitative and quantitative MRI techniques were not able to localize it (Tables 4(a) and 4(b)).
However, such techniques were not sufficient to some extent.
The two techniques were not mutually exclusive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com