Sentence examples for both techniques is the from inspiring English sources

The only difference between both techniques is the input frames.

The advantage of both techniques is the high sensitivity in biological systems down to the picomolar range.

Characterization results of catalysts used in both techniques are the same.

The [GdmCl]50%s determined by both techniques are the same within the experimental error (Fig. 5A), and the free energy, ΔG, is 7.3±0.5 kcal/mol (1 cal = 4.18 J).

The authors found effective both techniques being the probiotic population higher than the therapeutic limit [ 36].

Both techniques are the most suitable tools for the identification of novel ABCA4 variants not yet contained in the chip.

Indeed, most of the genes identified using both techniques were those that showed the greatest level of differential expression.

A limitation of both aforementioned techniques is the limited resolution of both IVUS (100 250 µm) [ 63– 67] 67] and IVMRI (120 440 µm) [ 68, 69].

The common disadvantage of both imaging techniques is the production of two-dimensional images only.

Another problem with both aforementioned techniques is the lack of oxygenation information that is essential in judging the wellbeing of the graft.

The purpose of both techniques is to reduce the effect of shrinkage stress associated with CR cements, obtaining a more stable adhesive interface [10 13].