Sentence examples for both techniques are not from inspiring English sources

However, both techniques are not devoid of inherent disadvantages.

Both techniques are not suited to test the underlying structure of the SDQ.

Although data to date look very promising, one must realise that both techniques are not yet validated to predict antitumour activity or real patient benefit in the clinical situation.

Bland and Altman analysis also revealed a significant bias (with radial SOS providing a lower estimation) and more importantly large limits of agreement between the Z-scores of measures, indicating that both techniques are not comparable.

For the dorsal slice the differences between both techniques were not statistically different.

Both techniques were not effective in the complete removal of debris from the isthmus regions.

The differences in manipulation time and procedure time between both techniques were not significant.

We suggest that these results, from both data analysis techniques, are not biologically relevant because the magnitudes of most of the changes were not large enough to have a biological significance (peak force loading rate differences less than 50%, and less than 0.05-fold differences in the percent of the ground reaction force above 60 Hz).

Both of these techniques are not conducive to continuous monitoring.

Both the above listed techniques are not suited for non-continuous CA scenarios.

The techniques are not fail-proof.