Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
Pre-travel vaccination rates were low across both study sites with 100 (11.9%) respondents reporting receipt of one or more vaccines specifically for this trip, including 73/298 (24.5%) of those reporting a pre-travel heath visit.
Interestingly, this maximum PAR irradiance was different at both study sites with values around 185 and 25 μmol photons m-2 s-1 at Helgoland and Hiddensee, respectively.
The combined distributions of AGB field estimates with respect to LiDAR predictors were visually assessed to come from the same distribution in both study sites with both field data, Comm and Prof, see Fig. 3.
Only a small portion of individuals in both study sites with NCDs used formal healthcare services.
The combined distributions of AGB field estimates with respect to LiDAR predictors were visually assessed to come from the same distribution in both study sites with both field data, Comm and Prof, see Fig. 3.
Similar(55)
Table 2 shows large variations in magnitudes of NEE, GPP, and ET across study sites, with a CV of 26, 34, and 17%%, respectively.
Results were similar when restricting analysis to study sites with a recruitment rate of at least 60% (7 sites, N = 413).
A total of 232 FFPE breast cancer blocks were collected by the 11 CBS study sites with a median of 22 (range 5 to 27) cases per site.
The WQI values of site S6, i.e., near Jagibhakatgaon, a rural area, was comparatively better among all the studied sites with values ranging from 49.25 during post-monsoon season to 88.15 during monsoon season.
We only observed continuously positive trends in growth for black spruce in the northernmost studied site, with declines occurring progressively sooner toward lower latitudes (Fig. 1b).
In our study we observed continuously positive trends in growth only for black spruce in the northernmost (coldest) studied site, with the onset of declines occurring progressively sooner (1970 at 43°N) towards lower latitudes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com