Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Approximately equal numbers were lost to follow-up or were excluded from final analysis in both study groups; we therefore believe that there was no selection bias.
To ensure robustness of identification of proteins as characteristic of one or the other or both study groups we imposed stringent criteria (see Methods).
For determination of glucose, total cholesterol, and uric acid levels in both study groups, we employed a commercial kit (Diagnostic Systems, Germany).
For both study groups we described the use of single embryo transfer in the first and second cycle, as well as the ongoing rates of pregnancy (defined as a viable pregnancy of >12 weeks' gestation) and of twin pregnancy.
Similar(56)
In both studied groups we found significant differences in the SOFA (10.17 vs. 8.7, P = 0.03) and in transferrin (147 mg/dl vs. 114 mg/dl, P = 0.002).
Moreover, although there was no (statistically significant) difference in hemorrhagic complications and blood product transfusions between the two study groups, we observed a tendency for less bleeding in the TEG group, with no difference in thrombosis.
Given the large differences in age between the two study groups, we performed a sensitivity analysis restricted to age (±5 years)- and sex-matched patients of the two groups using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.
Given this large number of differentially expressed genes between the study groups, we refined these data by concentrating our focus on genetic differences that had been identified previously between similar populations represented in the HapMap project.
Due to the rapid evolution of hypertensive diseases in our study groups, we could investigate only the biological effects of the antihypertensive treatment over a short time interval (maximum 48 hours).
As for α-adducin gene G460T, we identified 23 eligible reports published both in Chinese (n = 20) and English (n = 4), which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria, whereas due to the shared study groups, we removed five of them with the fewer sample sizes.
Although, we randomized patients into study groups, we found a significant difference in age among groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com