Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
This increase of ALP for both study groups was found statistically significant (p<. 05 for both).
The mean difference in knowledge and attitude scores between both study groups was 8.31 (p < 0.001) and 2.39 (p < 0.001), respectively.
The predominant vacA genotype signal sequence detected in both study groups was s1b, in agreement with our previous report [22].
The percentage of VN in both study groups was linearly correlated to serum dilution at all time points measured (data not shown).
The factor of group (blindfold vs. non blindfold) had no significant effect (p>0.05) suggesting that performance in both study groups was similar over the five-day period.
As with the von Frey hairs task, the factor of group (blindfold vs. non blindfold) had no significant effect (p>0.05) again suggesting that performance in both study groups was similar.
Similar(42)
As shown in Table 1, both study groups were similar.
Patients in both study groups were seen at 3- to 4-month intervals and were followed prospectively for 1 year.
In this study, no significant differences in response profile were detected based on route of delivery, i.e., both study groups were equally responsive to treatment.
According to French law, because the strategies used in both study groups are considered standard care, there was no requirement for signed informed consent.
Out of nine statements regarding cardiac arrest risk factors, more than two-thirds of the respondents in both study groups were "very sure/sure" that lack of exercise, smoking, hyperlipidemia and being overweight were risk factors for a heart attack.
More suggestions(15)
both study years was
both study groups were
both study contacts was
both study rounds was
both study periods was
both study interventions was
both study groups differed
both study groups received
both study areas was
both study groups showed
both study sites was
both study groups had
both study groups confirmed
both study phases was
both study selections was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com