Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
Demographic and clinical characteristics obtained on patients from both study arms were analyzed to point out an association with the response to the treatment.
Demographic (sex, age), clinical (body mass index, comorbidity, surgery) and headache characteristics (frequency, intensity, total and MOH duration, overused drugs) in Responders and Non-Responders (R and NR, respectively) from both study arms were compared.
Women in both study arms were invited for screening using a similar letter with general information on screening.
The most common adverse events observed in both study arms were: abnormal dreams/nightmares, dizziness, fatigue, somnolence, diarrhea, and headache.
The most frequently reported adverse events in both study arms were epistaxis, hematoma, and petechiae (Supporting Table 2; see online supporting information).
Baseline characteristics of subjects in both study arms were similar like age, gender, race, smoking history, BMI, and family history of colon cancer.
Similar(47)
A flow chart of the animals in both study arms is presented in Figs. 2 and 3. Fig. 2 Flow chart of animals in the sepsis groups Fig. 3 Flow chart of animals in the hemorrhage groups.
No carry over effects were detected and data from both study arms are combined.
Exacerbations in both study arms are defined using the Anthonisen symptom diary-card algorithm.
Demographic details of the sample for both study arms are provided in Table 1.
Administration of postoperative radiation therapy is registered and the percentage difference between both study arms is recorded.
More suggestions(20)
both trial arms were
both study species were
both study arms suffered
both study arms demonstrated
both study samples were
both study arms had
both chemotherapy arms were
both study phases were
both study treatments were
both study designs were
both study types were
both study sites were
both study arms showed
both study groups were
both study arms inhaled
both study strategies were
both study cohorts were
both study pools were
both study RHCs were
both study products were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com