Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
However, it should be noted that both studies were underpowered to detect treatment differences.
However, both studies were underpowered to look specifically at disease association in persons >65 years of age.
295 Two other small randomised studies have shown this combination to increase toxicity without any additional survival benefit (although both studies were underpowered to do so).
Positive associations were found in two studies examining weight concerns [ 50] and barriers to healthy eating [ 59] with excess GWG, but both studies were underpowered.
This could be implied that both studies were underpowered to detect the effect size reported in Straussman et al., 2012, which tested 34 samples, even though both studies were highly powered to detect larger effect sizes.
Similar(55)
Given the relatively low rates of local recurrence seen in routine clinical practice and within the trials, both studies are underpowered for a formal comparison of efficacy.
However, both these studies were underpowered to identify right sided sleep position as a risk factor and were unable to examine whether or not sleep position was a particular risk-factor for already compromised babies (FGR and RFM).
Moreover, many of the included studies were underpowered, and underpowered studies contribute biased effect size estimates.
Overall, these studies were underpowered for clinically important outcomes.
Further, many studies were underpowered to detect any but the largest statistical effects.
Finally, it is likely that the two studies were underpowered to demonstrate a difference in the principal endpoint.
More suggestions(15)
both studies were determined
both studies were made
both studies were ridiculed
both studies were rated
both studies were extended
both studies were pooled
both studies were performed
both studies were conducted
both studies were found
both studies were presented
both studies were led
both studies were carried
both studies were done
both studies were funded
both studies were approved
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com