Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Specifically, the samples in both studies were small, thereby raising concerns about high sample dependency.
Both studies were small, but did not find differences in screening between groups [ 11, 14].
Both studies were small (89 participants in Ethiopia and 59 in Turkey).
Both studies were small but the results are important and require further replication.
Both studies were small, with a combined sample size of 93 patients.
Both studies were small randomised controlled trials comparing peri-operative intramuscular testosterone against placebo in patients undergoing TKR.
Similar(49)
Both studies were smaller ones (< 500 respondents) and published before 2002.
However, the confidence intervals for the ETF study were wide (47 77%), and therefore it cannot be directly compared to the ECF data, and the number of patients in both studies was small.
The studies by Yildiz and colleagues [ 40] and Edinger and colleagues [ 46] could be considered as "outliers" because the treatments assessed in both studies were much more efficacious than the other treatments allocated to specialised care, but the size sample in both studies was small and the duration of treatment somewhat short.
Although some methodological concerns can be raised (the sample size of both studies is small; Lacey et al [ 16] did not perform analysis on an intention to treat basis), these studies suggest that glutamine supplementation enhances feeding tolerance and decreases infectious morbidity in VLBW infants.
Although the number of patients in both studies is small, the results of the two studies point in the same direction, indicating that the use of a panel of allogeneic prostate cancer cells may be represent an alternative to autologous tumour vaccines.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com