Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Both studies were rated as 'good'good
Similar(59)
Since both of these studies were rated as fair-quality studies (as indicated by the length of the bars in Fig. 2), according to best evidence synthesis, there is moderate evidence that patients' educational level is not related to their level of adherence.
28 Ten studies were independently assessed by two researchers (MO and ØH) 29 38 and three studies were rated by both researchers together.
Eleven studies (all longitudinal) were rated high, 14 studies were rated intermediate, and two studies were rated low.
These studies were rated Klimisch Code 2 (reliable with restrictions).
Three studies met the criteria for 5, one study was rated 4, and 21 studies were rated 3. Attention to experiences with discrimination was common throughout.
Twenty-six studies were rated; individual studies utilizing the isometric mid-thigh pull test were rated fair [38] and good [54].
The 30/42 studies were rated with a low risk of bias, and 12/42 had a medium risk.
However, seven of these studies were rated positive for measurement properties with correlations ≥0.70 with the gold standard test.
Three qualitative studies were rated low.
Most studies were rated high for selection bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com