Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Patients of both studies were comparable regarding age.
Otherwise, characteristics of patients accrued to both studies were comparable (Table 1).
8 9 Baseline vdH-S scores, pooled across both studies, were comparable across the three randomised treatment groups.
In another canine RAP study, AF promotion after 7 days of RAP was attenuated by simvastatine but not by antioxidant vitamins C and E. The dosages in both studies were comparable.
The MELD scores in both studies were comparable, but there is a difference of 10% in the one-year survival of all patients, which may be related to the quality of the donor graft.
Similar(55)
Overall mean rescue SABA use during both studies was comparable among groups, and overall mean AQLQ scores were comparable between the MEDI-528 groups and placebo at baseline and during the study.
Data from the flow cytometric studies were comparable to the IFN-γ ELISPOT (data not shown).
Included studies were comparable in terms of study population, intervention and outcome.
Despite a higher number of published studies for Actim® PROM, the total number of women included in both rapid test studies is comparable.
This result suggests that the titers ("units") of RV-IgA calculated for both types of vaccine studies are comparable and higher in countries where the vaccines work best.
Methodically the studies are comparable; both apply the Kaplan-Meier Sampling Average to calculate total costs.
More suggestions(18)
both studies were normal
both studies were large
both phases were comparable
both studies were qualitative
both techniques were comparable
both studies were cross-sectional
both studies were single
both meals were comparable
both studies were multi-centre
both assays were comparable
both studies showed comparable
both profiles were comparable
both studies were single-arm
both years were comparable
both media were comparable
both extracts were comparable
both studies were open
both rates were comparable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com