Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(23)
Both studies were based on personal interviews conducted with thousands of individuals from all over the United States.
Previous molecular analyses of the Amphiumidae based on allozymes [23] and mitochondrial DNA sequences [24] found conflicting relationships, although both studies were based on limiting sampling.
Both studies were based on fresh frozen material.
Both studies were based on voluntary, informed participation.
Both studies were based on self-reported exposures.
Both studies were based on small morphological datasets with few characters, the phylogenetic utility of which has been questioned [ 10].
Similar(37)
Both studies are based on the DNase I hypersensitivity assay, which detects genomic regions at which enzyme access to, and subsequent cleavage of, DNA is unobstructed by chromatin proteins.
Both studies are based on responses from the same sample of 73,000 people who owned or leased new vehicles from the 2011 model year.
However, both studies are based on correlation analysis and, consequently, they are not sufficient for deriving valid conclusions about the causal links between the examined variables.
The definition of cardiotoxicity in both studies was based on the Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee's (CREC) criteria of drug-associated cardiotoxicity: a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥5 to <55% with symptoms of heart failure (HF) or an asymptomatic reduction of LVEF of ≥10 to <55% [4, 5, 24].
Both studies are based on small patient numbers.
More suggestions(17)
both stories were based
both plays were based
both approaches were based
both pilots were based
both studies were encouraged
both interventions were based
both treatments were based
both studies were ridiculed
both brothers were based
both movies were based
both surveys were based
both ships were based
both proposals were based
both functions were based
both reviews were based
both maps were based
both datasets were based
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com