Sentence examples for both studies may be from inspiring English sources

The small number of miRNAs that are highly informative in both studies may be due to the different experimental approaches used in the two studies.

The difference with regard to the TER results between both studies may be, at least partially, explained by the different origin of the target cells or rIL-22 used.

The estimation of statistical significance revealed a significant overlap between the two studies (One-tailed Chi-square test p-value = 1.17×10−2), providing further evidence that many of the significant genes that are common to both studies may be implicated in breast cancer metastasis – as they were detected by independent groups, using slightly different experimental approaches.

This suggests that the codon deoptimized dhfr used in both studies may be comparable.

Even though both studies made considerable efforts to increase participation, the actual participation rates achieved in both studies may be too low to guarantee representativeness in higher ages.

The wide disparity in the proportions of herbal medicine users for malaria in both studies may be as a result of the differences in herbal medicine definition.

The discrepancies observed between both atherosclerosis progression studies may be explained by the different oligonucleotide chemistry and slightly different diets used.

All these discrepancies observed both in animal and human studies may be due to diversity in the utilized transgenic models, tests performed at different ages or different stages of the disease.

The most likely explanation, which is consistent with other studies, may be that both methods underestimate the number of carriers in families with insignificant family history [ 42], that is both methods underestimate the exceptional nature of the families, within the context of a lower population rate of breast cancer.

Yet, when considering the use of PET-CT for radiation planning, it should be borne in mind that oral and intravenous contrast media may adversely affect the CT attenuation maps that are used to estimate regionally delivered radiation doses and hence both non-enhanced and contrast-enhanced studies may be necessary.

True, the methodology of particular studies may be challenged, and some of the figures arrived at may be disputed.