Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(35)
However, both studies did not specifically focus on ARDS patients.
Both studies did not define the time frame for the headache prevalence.
However, both studies did not control for food intake, light exposure, sleep schedule and social habits that accompany Ramadan.
Despite their differences in resolution and proposed positions of the N- and C-termini, crystal structures in both studies did not resolve the same elements: the loop between the C-domain and the point of contact that the C-tail makes with the N-domain, as well as distal C-tail (residues 363 404) (Granzin et al., 1998; Hirsch et al., 1999) (Fig. 1).
However, both studies did not mention at which stages interossicular ligaments were present.
Both studies did not employ two drivers conducting glial cell lineage expression at different developmental stages.
Similar(25)
Both studies do not differentiate between the procedures performed.
Because of these differences, results of both studies do not exclude each other.
Health care providers participating in both studies do not receive incentives.
However, both studies do not account for neighbourhood conditions, and they also provide no insight into the association between regional characteristics and specific health outcomes.
Although it is not unexpected that the response measured by this assay is reduced when the vaccine dose is reduced, the small numbers of volunteers in both studies do not allow an accurate determination of the magnitude of this reduction.
More suggestions(17)
both strains did not
both countries did not
both promoters did not
both camps did not
both patients did not
both companies did not
both processes did not
both disciplines did not
both phases did not
both groups did not
both parties did not
both kidneys did not
both contaminants did not
both cytokines did not
both studies was not
both firms did not
both subgroups did not
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com