Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Therefore, both studies are not easily comparable.
However, the results of both studies are not directly comparable since they focused on highly selected applicants, i.e. besides the approved only the best rejected applicants.
Outcome data for both studies are not available at this time.
These results are not comparable because the health problems taken into account by both studies are not strictly identical.
Both studies are not explicitly focused on hospitals and include other contexts such as small clinics and national or regional EHR initiatives.
But the results of both studies are not comparable, because Alió et al. used a different population (myopic patient) compared to the present study (cataract patient).
Similar(50)
Considering that the OMEGA parameters used in both studies were not exactly identical and that we used their reported rotatable bond count rather than effective rotor count, this may suggest that Eq (5) may have applicability beyond the parameter sets used in this study.
A pooled estimate including both Caucasians and African-Americans from both studies was not noticeably different from the estimate restricted to Caucasians (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05 1.41; Table 5).
The influenza cases in both studies were not laboratory-confirmed.
The evidence for association, although present in both studies, is not altogether convincing.
However, as noted by the authors, groups used for comparison in both studies were not homogeneous.
More suggestions(19)
both characteristics are not
both teams are not
both snakes are not
both assumptions are not
both spouses are not
both atoms are not
both men are not
both startups are not
both features are not
both effects are not
both techniques are not
both locations are not
both concepts are not
both actions are not
both links are not
both groups are not
both technologies are not
both metrics are not
both metals are not
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com