Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Both studies are based on responses from the same sample of 73,000 people who owned or leased new vehicles from the 2011 model year.
Both studies are based on the DNase I hypersensitivity assay, which detects genomic regions at which enzyme access to, and subsequent cleavage of, DNA is unobstructed by chromatin proteins.
However, both studies are based on correlation analysis and, consequently, they are not sufficient for deriving valid conclusions about the causal links between the examined variables.
Both studies are based on small patient numbers.
Both studies are based on 24 h RC measurement with known feed intake.
However, both studies are based on a broad range of patient diagnoses and procedures.
Similar(50)
Both studies were based on personal interviews conducted with thousands of individuals from all over the United States.
The definition of cardiotoxicity in both studies was based on the Cardiac Review and Evaluation Committee's (CREC) criteria of drug-associated cardiotoxicity: a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥5 to <55% with symptoms of heart failure (HF) or an asymptomatic reduction of LVEF of ≥10 to <55% [4, 5, 24].
Previous molecular analyses of the Amphiumidae based on allozymes [23] and mitochondrial DNA sequences [24] found conflicting relationships, although both studies were based on limiting sampling.
Both studies were based on fresh frozen material.
Both studies were based on voluntary, informed participation.
More suggestions(15)
both studies are published
both studies are summarised
both arguments are based
both studies are summarized
both searches are based
both conclusions are based
both values are based
both studies are supported
both methods are based
both studies are listed
both organizations are based
both systems are based
both approaches are based
both articles are based
both studies are derived
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com