Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The genome-wide distributions of piRNA expression on both strands were compared among four samples.
Similar(59)
The strains measured by Smart Strands were compared with those measured by the remaining electrical resistance gauges attached to the surface of helical wires, corresponding to the same grating points.
The distribution of genes of different categories (essential/non-essential, highly expressed/non-highly expressed) and their densities in the leading and the lagging strands were compared between strains.
Characteristics of TRs in different genomic regions and among different strands are compared in details for D. pulex and the two model insects Apis mellifera and Drosophila melanogaster.
To determine whether any of these genes showed evidence of high or phloem-specific expression, expression in the phloem-enriched strands was compared with pith (non-phloem) tissue isolated from stems.
AC and pulsed magnetization-based elasto-magnetic measurement methods of tensile force in steel strand are compared in the study.
Nucleotide sequences were determined for internal fragments of the acsA, aroE, guaA, mutL, nuoD, ppsA, and trpE genes, on both strands, and were compared with sequences in the P. aeruginosa MLST website (http://pubmlst.org/paeruginosa) for the assignment of allele numbers and sequence types (ST).
For example, the -5p strands of miR-423 were overrepresented in DKO-1 exosomes but in exosomes from DKs-8 cells, both strands were overrepresented compared to cells (data not shown).
DNA sequences for both strands were aligned and compared to verify accuracy.
For consistency, the probe sequences and their genomic strand information were compared between these two annotation sources.
Amplicons were sequenced on both strands and predicted peptide sequences were compared to the corresponding gene from the MG1655 genome [ 25] by pair-wise FASTA alignments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com