Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Brain acetylcholinesterase (AchE) was inhibited by AZM in both species, while the buffer enzyme carboxylesterase (CarbE) was not affected in this tissue.
The GAT1 sequences are the same in both species while the rat GAT2 is orthologous to mouse GAT3 and the rat GAT3 is orthologous to mouse GAT4 [40].
Similar(58)
δ e =0.0 means that P. ridibundus have the same fitness as P. lessonae (i.e. the environment includes niches for both species), while δ e =0.4 represents the fact that P. ridibundus are strongly disadvantaged compared to P. lessonae (i.e. the environment consists of a typical P. lessonae habitat).
Exon 2 and the corresponding domain α1 had the highest diversity in both species, while exon 4 and domain α3 had the lowest.
In the Molecular Function ontology, 'cofactor binding' (GO 0048037), 'coenzyme binding' (GO 0050662), 'peptidase inhibitor activity' (GO 0030414) and 'endopeptidase inhibitor activity' (GO 0004866) were enriched in both species, while another nine terms from the Molecular Function ontology were enriched exclusively in P. euphratica.
The highest concentrations of Cd and Zn were found in the bone of both species while Cu and Fe accumulated mainly in kidney or liver.
Two Swedish sites, the Danish site and three French sites had both species, while others had only one.
HMGA2 could potentially serve as tumour marker in both species while HMGA1 might play a minor role in OSCC progression.
Clades West and Central are represented in both species, while Clade East is restricted to R. rupicapra.
As a result, four model pairs were used twice for both focal species, while the rest of the models were used only once per species.
The UGT201A, UGT201B, UGT202A and UGT204A subfamily are clearly more numerous in T. urticae compared to both Panonychus species while the opposite could be observed for the UGT201G subfamily, suggesting the UGTs in these subfamilies probably arose in T. urticae or were lost in P. ulmi after diversification within the Tetranychidae.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com