Both show the same hammer; in "Abuse of Power," the hammer is pulling a nail out of a board, while in "Retribution," the hammer itself is nailed to the wall.
Sure, I'm guessing that during some scenes, effects are rendered slightly differently, or the shaders have minor differences, but overall the two systems seem to both show the same gorgeous brown graphics.
For all samples measured, they found that emissivity and reflectance both show the same trend: Significant variations from values obtained at the nadir (0° emergence angle) appear only for emergence angles ≥ 40°.
Comparing the two line profiles, they both show the same general trends: larger lattice size in the STO, and smaller in the LSMO, with a slight lattice size increase at about 8 nm into the film.
In particular, the maps corresponding to the additive models for (Y_1) (Fig. 4a, b both show the same states with larger positive residuals, which have darker shading. These states include Nevada, Texas, Florida, and Alaska.
Both show the same dataset for Whakatane probabilistic ash hazard, but the presentation of the curve in A shows the average absolute probability, along with the 10th and 90th percentile lines, and in B shows the average absolute probability, where the area between the 10th and 90th percentile lines is presented as an 80% confidence interval.
We found two components in the data, both showing the same intensity modulation frequency, but with different response amplitudes (b).
However, both groups had similar clinical features and both showed the same rate of ischaemic complications [6 7% of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndromes (PRES) and of ischaemic stroke].
Cellular p53 accumulation, within either the nucleus or the cytoplasm or in both, showed the same association with different pathobiological variables as nuclear accumulation alone.
The second mouse Enam mutation (c.A382T; p.Lys128*) was dominant so that mice heterozygous and homozygous for the mutation both showed the same level of defective "whitish" enamel.
