both sets of interviews

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "both sets of interviews" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to two distinct groups or categories of interviews that have been conducted. Example: "After analyzing both sets of interviews, we found common themes that emerged from the participants' responses."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Similar themes arose in both sets of interviews, indicating that the interviewers' gender did not positively or negatively impact the quality of the data that was generated in the interviews.

BMC Public Health

Topic guides for both sets of interviews were developed from the relevant literature (see Table  2).

BMC Family Practice

The data from both sets of interviews were analyzed based on trend analysis.

Health Research Policy and Systems

For clarification, issues raised from both sets of interviews were followed up during seven interviews with district level officers and programme managers.

BMC Health Services Research

During both sets of interviews, the practical aspects of caring for their baby in a frank and touching manner were raised as real concerns, especially by the men.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Similar outcome themes emerged from both patient and practitioner interviews, so we decided to have a single coding frame, which could be applied to both sets of interviews.

BMC Family Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Both researchers read both sets of coded interviews and co-operated on a cross-case analysis [ 14].

BMC Health Services Research

During this process the two coders spoke weekly by phone, comparing progress, but more importantly noting issues of misalignment which could potentially complicate the necessary final merge of both sets of coded interviews.

BMC Health Services Research

Of the 65 participating adolescents, 48 participated in both sets of focus group interviews, 12 only in the first, and 5 only in the second.

BMC Health Services Research

The children, then aged 6 through 23, in both sets of families were interviewed initially, then 2 years later and again after 10 years by psychiatric professionals who did not know the mental health of the parents or their offspring.

The New York Times - Science

The five acupuncturists handed out 65 information sheets; 27 of these were returned; 25 consented and completed the first set of questionnaires (I ineligible, 1 withdrew); and 23 completed both sets of questionnaires and the interview (one withdrew due to illness, one couldn't be contacted).

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about research, clarify the criteria used to differentiate "both sets of interviews". For instance, specify if the sets are divided by participant group, time period, or interview type.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "both sets of interviews" without clearly defining what each set comprises. Always provide context to ensure the reader understands the composition and distinction of each set.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "both sets of interviews" functions as a determiner phrase identifying two specific groups of interviews within a larger study or context. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's used to differentiate between two distinct collections of interview data.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "both sets of interviews" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to differentiate between two specific groups of interviews, often within a research or analytical context. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and provides several examples from reliable sources. To ensure clarity, it's crucial to define what distinguishes each set. Alternatives include "the two interview groups" or "both interview series". While generally neutral in register, its usage leans towards formal, particularly in scientific and academic settings. Remember to specify the criteria for distinguishing between the sets, as ambiguity can reduce the quality of your writing. The most frequent usage is in scientific literature, followed by news and media.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the two interview groups

This alternative emphasizes the division into two groups based on the interviews.

the two interview cohorts

This alternative uses "cohorts", implying groups sharing a characteristic or experience (the interview).

both interview series

This alternative replaces "sets" with "series", highlighting the sequential nature of the interviews.

the two batches of interviews

This alternative uses "batches" to describe the interviews as separate collections.

both collections of interviews

This alternative uses the term "collections" to refer to the two groups of interviews.

the first and second interview phases

This alternative emphasizes the temporal order of the two interview sets.

both rounds of interviews

This alternative uses "rounds" indicating a stage or iteration of interviews.

the two interview samples

This alternative uses "samples", implying a subset of a larger population.

both segments of interviews

This alternative uses "segments" indicating that the interview process was divided into two sections.

the two sets of discussions

This alternative is broader, referring to the interview as a kind of discussion but still retains the original meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "both sets of interviews" in a research paper?

When referring to "both sets of interviews" in your research, clearly define what distinguishes each set. For example, you might say, "In the first set of interviews, participants discussed their initial experiences, while the second set focused on long-term outcomes."

What can I say instead of "both sets of interviews"?

You can use alternatives like "the two interview groups", "the two interview cohorts", or "both interview series" depending on the context.

Is it necessary to define "both sets of interviews" when using the phrase?

Yes, it is crucial to define what constitutes each set of interviews to avoid ambiguity. Specify the criteria that differentiate the two sets, such as participant demographics, interview questions, or timeframes.

What's the difference between "both sets of interviews" and "all the interviews"?

"Both sets of interviews" implies a specific division into two distinct groups, while "all the interviews" refers to the entirety of the interviews conducted, without necessarily suggesting a specific grouping or categorization.