Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Differences in the proportion of both screening groups were compared using the χ‐test and Student's t‐test.
Similar(59)
Increasing cervical screening coverage by reaching inadequately screened groups is essential for improving the effectiveness of cervical screening programs.
The screened group were more likely to be female, but they were older and more deprived than the unscreened group, suggesting no clear direction of potential bias.
The stage of the cancer and surgical treatment in the screening groups were compared with the diagnostic group.
A cataract screening program, including a total of 27 screening groups, was conducted in the rural Chaoshan area of eastern Guangdong province between March 2008 and March 2009.
What is striking in the two screening groups is that the proportion of DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) was 23.1 %, compared to only 2.5%% in the diagnostic group.
When the stage at diagnosis in the screening groups was compared with the diagnostic group, it was shown that 84.6 % breast cancer diagnosed by screening was in the early stages (Stage 0 2) compared to 61.1%% in the diagnostic group.
31 Although Fukao et al. 32 reported differences in family history and smoking between participants and non‐participants in gastric cancer screening, the difference in the backgrounds between the endoscopic and radiographic screening groups is unclear.
Results: Women in the later screening group were likely to have hydramnios (12.7 versus 2.1%, P<0.0001) and preterm deliveries (11.8 versus 5.5%; P=0.03).
9 The tumours in the screening group were smaller and more often localised than in the control group.
We will also calculate how many participants in the diagnostic screening group were initially incorrectly diagnosed with COPD or HF.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com