Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The correlation coefficients between both scales were statistically significant.
*MPD: minor psychiatric disorders, assed by GHQ-12 > 4 ** PR: Prevalence Ratio by Poisson regression *** one or more doses per day Figure 1 and Table 2 indicates that adverse working conditions assessed by both scales were statistically associated with the presence of MPD.
Similar(58)
The overall model results for all three subgroups in both BPI severity and BPI interference scales were statistically significant (P < .001).001
Hypothesized correlations between cardiac module and core scales were statistically significant, ranging from 0.36 to 0.78.
Almost all the group differences on the symptom scales were statistically significant at p < 0.05 with the notable exception of the Anxious Shy scale from the CPRS-R L [ F (2, 57) = 1.796, p = 0.175].
The correlations between each of the dichotomous illness variables and all other chronic illness measures (including the unweighted and weighted scales) were statistically different, given the large differences in the size of the correlations.
In Model 2 (i.e., the backward elimination model), the five scales were statistically significant; the emotional functioning scale, which had a p value of 0.071 in Model 1, became statistically significant in Model 2, with a p value of 0.01.
When comparing patients' scores for the SI and PR scales, SI scales were statistically significantly higher for the factor 'Symptom relief' in the MT dimension, for the factors "'Information' and 'Participation' in the ID dimension and for the factors "'Continuity' and 'Planning and cooperation' in the SC dimension.
Uncertainty is compounded when clustered data points collected at local scales are statistically upscaled to one or two points for use in regional models.
The scores of CADASIL scales are statistically higher in CADASIL group than CADASIL-like group (p = 0.047).
We will test whether any observed differences resulting from the use of different scales are statistically significant using the bootstrap method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com